This week I attended a workshop for Save the Children (SC) Staff on Child Rights Programming. This workshop comes as part of a long-term move by SC worldwide to orient its activities towards a rights rather than needs based approach. Here are some of my reactions from the first…and I felt most interesting day.
---------------------------------------------
I am enjoying discussing theoretical issues of development with people here who all have expansive field experience working on child’s issues but many of whom have done little university education. The environment and perspectives have a different flavour to those I experience in the classroom although the same approaches and theories are being discussed. These people are the primary actors on the ground so what is important for them is how an idea or concept affects and integrates into their dealing with communities and children.
Much of our discussion focuses on shifting from a needs to a rights based approach to children’s issues which essentially involves changing language and phrasing used to describe projects but holds important implications for actual programs and the overall focus of the organization.
A needs based approach to development whether children or not looks at basic needs of shelter, food, water and also emotional, social and cognitive needs for a full and quality life. These things will be given to recipients, who are viewed as passive beneficiaries of the goodwill of the providers. A rights based approach in contrast addresses the same components for life, but frames them as entitlements that are inalienable and duty bearers are obliged to fulfill to rights holders. Powerful language.
Needs based action on children’s issues is spontaneous, reactive, founded on charity and goodwill with children seen as the object of care. Such actions tend to form short-term solutions to specific problems with remedies for symptoms not causes. Rights based action meanwhile looks at addressing violations of clear rights and ensuring that children have their rights fulfilled. It emphasizes root causes, responsibility and accountability, building capacity and creating legal support to generate long-term, preventative solutions.
What interests me about all this is that the same issue can be addressed through either way; however, the legal and power implications are different. Look for example at food security. A needs based solution would be to give food handouts to needy children by a donor organization who is viewed as a saviour of sorts. A rights based solution meanwhile would be work with/ advocate to the actors responsible for fulfilling the children’s right to food to establish a system to ensure this right is always filled.
Approaches to child abuse provide another example. A needs based approach would focus on following up on specific cases to help affected children meet their needs and removing them from the abusive situation. A rights approach meanwhile would address the right to protection from abuse. It would focus on teaching children about what constitutes abuse and the resources available to them and working to establish and strengthen legal and enforcement systems for all children. While I use general examples here. They are very real and reflect the actions that SC and other NGOs take in communities.
Shifting to a rights based approach is however very challenging, particularly somewhere like Swaziland where children are seen and not heard, corporal punishment is the norm and the younger you are the more you work. This approach points out the duties and responsibilities of parents, the state and society that they are often unwilling to admit. It further removes the self-righteousness and sense of charitability that currently comes with work done for children and teaches children to speak out and assert themselves, which may come as a threat to authority figures. The SC staff do feel that improvements are being made with each new generation, although enormous perseverance and optimism remains the key.
-------------------------------------------
The workshop was opened with a discussion of children’s rights abuses experienced by participants during childhood, some of which really shocked me – especially given how outspoken, morally driven and intelligent these people have grown up to be.
Many talked of their parents communicating to them through a stick. Whenever their parents spoke it came with a beating. They would wake up to “why are you still asleep” – wack wack”. At mealtime it was “come eat dinner – wack wack”, “then go do your chores – wack wack”. Beating was not a form of discipline but came even before they had the chance to do anything wrong.
The norm for most was to wake up at 4am to work in the fields before school. Then as soon as they came home from school hey would go back to the field for more work. Of course if they were late for school after their morning work teachers beat them and if they were late coming home after school they were also beaten.
One women described being forced to eat out of a communal bowl on the floor with all the children in her family from her father, stepmother etc. (Swazi families are very big). One day when they were called to come eat the dogs came before the children and ate part of the food. When the kids arrived they refused to eat the food but were forced to eat what was left from the dogs.
One man as a child had lived with his mother who abandoned him at a young age to go work. He was left completely alone in their rural homestead, which was falling apart and could not be lived in. Through his school years he lived under a bush forging for food from garbage bins and working odd jobs for neighbours to pay school fees. Amazingly he completed school.
Another boy that stayed with his grandparents because his parents had left him had to miss one out of three school days for years to take care of the grandparents’ cattle. He would also have to take the cattle to the dipping tank for disinfecting from disease. This entailed walking for kilometers and spending the night outside waiting in line, on his own even though he was less than 10years old.
While these people are all adults now they also talked about stories of abuse in today’s society. Children are being made to dance to attract tourists by stone carvers along a tourist route. They dance all day, everyday, year after year and do not get to attend school.
A teen who’s parents had died of AIDS had her 9year-old sister taken away by family members. She was told the girl was going to South Africa to visit other relatives but she never returned and those that took the girl elude the topic, refusing to tell her what had happened to her sister. Since she lives in a remote area and has no money there is little she can do to follow the case.
These are just a sample of abuses I have heard in person there are others though, numerous, which are reported in the newspaper and people have told me. They make me feel sick and reinforce to me the value of the work Save the Children does to address protection and prevention from all angles involving children, parents, communities, schools and government.